Cities, as we know, not shareholders - at least not in the true sense of the word. Residents of the city have rights, but does not own shares in the stock sense. You can buy and sell shares of Apple, but you can buy and sell shares verpackungsmaterialien in San Francisco.
Why can not we own the city as much as we may possess verpackungsmaterialien commercial joint stock company? First, because the city not issue shares. Unlike commercial company is owned by the city of many shareholders, each of which would be owned his share. Cities like this just do not work.
Instead of shareholders, the city residents and voters. Instead verpackungsmaterialien of investors verpackungsmaterialien in shares of city finances its activities tolerated without taxes and issuing bonds. Instead of trying to profit center to care for the public good. And if the city goes bankrupt? Instead cleared the field better competitors continue with further problems.
Those who in their own land and buildings should have the greatest interest in the development of the city, but even they are not shareholders. Neither verpackungsmaterialien officials who directly benefit from the income of the city, not even a single share. The city actually owned one. We should not be surprised, therefore, that certain parts of the city resemble land anyone - disorder, theft and neglect.
How this could be improved? Even in this case, the public sector can take lessons from the functioning of the private sector. First, the work of many companies often like the city. Second, companies owned by employees and owners can prosper. The lesson is that the city should enjoy the benefits of stock ownership.
Notice how sometimes private workplaces resemble verpackungsmaterialien cities: Factories, banks and shops have their internal alleys and streets, even have their own climate (so there is always someone swears it's too cold or too hot). Most workplaces resembles cities only partly corridors instead of streets and bosses instead of politicians. However, some workplaces range of areas and city services to overcome.
Air Boeing factory in Everett, Washington has, in terms of area, the largest building in the world. In the hall, the company verpackungsmaterialien has its own street (for electric vehicles), railway station, fire station, security service and a water purifier. There is a bank, a health center, kindergarten, verpackungsmaterialien five stalls with coffee companies Tully and 19 eateries and restaurants. Some large corporate complexes include supermarkets, restaurants, fitness centers and even housing for some employees. Company Ford Motor Company once tried to set up an entire city and rubber processing factory in the Amazon, verpackungsmaterialien the project company town but failed. Since workplace resemble towns in scope, can study centers also bring something to improve governance at the municipal level.
In what cities can learn from successful workplaces? Of course in many ways. As demonstrated by Oliver Porter, who helped to found the city of Sandy Springs, Georgia, cities can benefit verpackungsmaterialien from the business model used by large developers and general contractors. Sandy Springs uses a tender for the supply of most services - repair of streets, maintenance of parks, etc. The city has a supervisory committee to monitor spending. Example Sandy Springs followed by other cities benefit their budget and citizens.
Another important lesson for city administration represent the company's employee-driven. The USA is now over 11,000 companies owned by employees, which employs 13 million workers-owners. Employee-owned firms exist from small businesses where the owner is the sole employee, verpackungsmaterialien to giant companies verpackungsmaterialien such as Basque Mondragon Corporation, with annual revenues exceeding $ 18 billion and 152 thousand employees.
Why Employee-owned businesses operate? Because employee-owned combines employee motivation and interests of the enterprise as a whole. Studies show that under otherwise identical circumstances, the company owned by employees have about 6-14 percent verpackungsmaterialien higher efficiency. Employees with-profits working harder than wage workers.
Percentage of employees on the property to help reconcile the interests of those who work for the Company, and society as a whole. Company management, shared by both investors and employees, to protect both investors and employee-owners. What would be the likely outcome of the application of the same principle to the city? Order, prosperity and harmony.
Suppose that the project verpackungsmaterialien of the new city wanted to follow the example of business start-ups and events in the city would be divided verpackungsmaterialien among investors and residents. Regular city today something impossible. But if the city had the character of a joint stock company, could such a city beginning to align the interests of the population and the community as a whole.
Such newly founded city would resemble ordinary co-ownership housing, where residents have a voting share in the administration building and common land. In other words, residents own owner of the house where he lived. Some projects co-ownership housing range surpasses even smaller cities, eg. Bronx's Co-Op
No comments:
Post a Comment