The riches of the Catholic Church (ICAR or Whore of Babylon) | Analysis Paralysis.
When writing polyformgift the previous post I have not been very welcome. From his tone and content would seem that because of the persecution that is unfolding again, the charge to the persecutors, not the hunted. Something they have done to be insulted and vilified by imprecadores.
And simultaneously it has crossed my path an interview with Carlos Santana that made him the XL Semanal today, and which states that never go to the Vatican to sing as he does not sell half of their wealth.
Why the Church is rich? I will not entertain in discussing whether the Church polyformgift exists as possessing goods which may have entity. It is a complicated issue to understand for someone who does not want to understand. Basically figuring out who owns the property, and who can have them, but that is complex.
Assuming, that is much assume that there was a church that was SA owns all assets polyformgift are assumed to be owned by the Church, there are two intriguing questions: how the Church came to own both? Why not sell it to care for the world's poor?
How accumulate wealth? Easy: Slowly, preventing waste and encouraging accumulate, for 2000 years. Imagine a priest who assigned a parish on the outskirts of a town. There man (having a subsistence wage) begins to devote his time to the parish. He works 16 hours a day, get others to work for free and local procurement for mounting outside the parish and a local for Caritas polyformgift ... The passage of time does the rest. If the following does nothing to cure the parish, local not lost, if the following polyformgift is equally enterprising, like riding a shelter polyformgift for homeless people, and so every year. Also outside the city center become, and what was once nothing, are now piles of possessions in the new city center ... Now extend that for hundreds of years with tens of thousands of priests, nuns and friars involving million laity.
Indeed accounts do not go: he left open system would have accumulated much more. But the inconsistency of the theory polyformgift with reality, is because every so often political power robs the Church an important part of its assets (eg confiscation of Mendizabal in Spain).
a) If possible and appropriate, it is sold. There are religious orders who are selling polyformgift or renting, or all of their land in Spain to build hospitals and schools polyformgift in the Third World. That's it.
b) S i salable everything was put on sale at a time would be worth nothing polyformgift (as an example we have the confiscation of Mendizabal in Spain that only served to gifted to the country's richest properties).
c) There are times that can not be sold because the laws prevent it. There artistic heritage that can not be sold, because it would be a crime, in fact no longer belong to the Church but to the "community" where they are.
Yes and no. The sell half possessions, polyformgift or even just offer to sell half of possessions is a matter of disposition, picture, be clear who are those possessions, and they are.
To give a concrete example, there is no reason why the Catholic hospitals can not become polyformgift civil organizations, nonprofit. There is no reason why the church have (or want) to maintain control.
I do not know much about it, but that to sell a Michelangelo seems an obscenity, that is, if I sell it to a private, for many contracts private are signed with his good will it do what you want and you then claim.
On the other hand if I charge admission to see the works that I treasure, I know two things, first at the door, everyone says go that bastards these Catholics taking us pasta, but if you paste you the takes the Thyssen then fails nothing, but besides that first premise of being a bastard receivable entering see a mine well, with that money, ticket, can feed many people in the world, is perhaps the subject of giving a fish or a reed, the Vatican seems to have a beer, why sell it in exchange for a fish?
That's "richest political entities in the world" is so vague that it serves a broken and for stitching, and say that Catholic hospitals are not entities nonprofit that have boards, which send unfortunately in more than cases, more technical than the founders is not know reality.
What riches to give glory to God or man, perhaps there was a time that was, and perhaps still are people who do, but not all, not provided for those mistakes, we are in business as usual as usual forgiveness may request two thousand times every day for what
When writing polyformgift the previous post I have not been very welcome. From his tone and content would seem that because of the persecution that is unfolding again, the charge to the persecutors, not the hunted. Something they have done to be insulted and vilified by imprecadores.
And simultaneously it has crossed my path an interview with Carlos Santana that made him the XL Semanal today, and which states that never go to the Vatican to sing as he does not sell half of their wealth.
Why the Church is rich? I will not entertain in discussing whether the Church polyformgift exists as possessing goods which may have entity. It is a complicated issue to understand for someone who does not want to understand. Basically figuring out who owns the property, and who can have them, but that is complex.
Assuming, that is much assume that there was a church that was SA owns all assets polyformgift are assumed to be owned by the Church, there are two intriguing questions: how the Church came to own both? Why not sell it to care for the world's poor?
How accumulate wealth? Easy: Slowly, preventing waste and encouraging accumulate, for 2000 years. Imagine a priest who assigned a parish on the outskirts of a town. There man (having a subsistence wage) begins to devote his time to the parish. He works 16 hours a day, get others to work for free and local procurement for mounting outside the parish and a local for Caritas polyformgift ... The passage of time does the rest. If the following does nothing to cure the parish, local not lost, if the following polyformgift is equally enterprising, like riding a shelter polyformgift for homeless people, and so every year. Also outside the city center become, and what was once nothing, are now piles of possessions in the new city center ... Now extend that for hundreds of years with tens of thousands of priests, nuns and friars involving million laity.
Indeed accounts do not go: he left open system would have accumulated much more. But the inconsistency of the theory polyformgift with reality, is because every so often political power robs the Church an important part of its assets (eg confiscation of Mendizabal in Spain).
a) If possible and appropriate, it is sold. There are religious orders who are selling polyformgift or renting, or all of their land in Spain to build hospitals and schools polyformgift in the Third World. That's it.
b) S i salable everything was put on sale at a time would be worth nothing polyformgift (as an example we have the confiscation of Mendizabal in Spain that only served to gifted to the country's richest properties).
c) There are times that can not be sold because the laws prevent it. There artistic heritage that can not be sold, because it would be a crime, in fact no longer belong to the Church but to the "community" where they are.
Yes and no. The sell half possessions, polyformgift or even just offer to sell half of possessions is a matter of disposition, picture, be clear who are those possessions, and they are.
To give a concrete example, there is no reason why the Catholic hospitals can not become polyformgift civil organizations, nonprofit. There is no reason why the church have (or want) to maintain control.
I do not know much about it, but that to sell a Michelangelo seems an obscenity, that is, if I sell it to a private, for many contracts private are signed with his good will it do what you want and you then claim.
On the other hand if I charge admission to see the works that I treasure, I know two things, first at the door, everyone says go that bastards these Catholics taking us pasta, but if you paste you the takes the Thyssen then fails nothing, but besides that first premise of being a bastard receivable entering see a mine well, with that money, ticket, can feed many people in the world, is perhaps the subject of giving a fish or a reed, the Vatican seems to have a beer, why sell it in exchange for a fish?
That's "richest political entities in the world" is so vague that it serves a broken and for stitching, and say that Catholic hospitals are not entities nonprofit that have boards, which send unfortunately in more than cases, more technical than the founders is not know reality.
What riches to give glory to God or man, perhaps there was a time that was, and perhaps still are people who do, but not all, not provided for those mistakes, we are in business as usual as usual forgiveness may request two thousand times every day for what
No comments:
Post a Comment